![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
| You'll need to do a bit of visualization for this explanation...so put away the Playstation 2 for a sec and follow along... :) Think of your truck in its stock configuration....as the wheels rotate, the axle wants to rotate the OPPOSITE direction, right? And this for-every-action-there-is-an-opposite-and-equal-reaction characteristic is what actual MOVES your vehicle...more or less. As the wheels rotate, the axle rotates the opposite way, inducing motive force into the vehicle....now, this IS a gross oversimplification, but it is a fact, nevertheless....what is MORE important is that all the OTHER drivetrain geometries...piniuon angle, anti-squat, instant center....all VERY important geometries..are based on this physical arrangement. Think about braking, for a second.....in the stock configuration,, when you hit the brakes, what happens? Correct...the car has a tendency to dip, the rear has a tendency to rise....but the rear is trying to rise "over" the front leaf spring mount, right? And the basic lever arrangement that is formed by the stock position of the axle and the leaf spring tries to lift the truck OVER the front leaf spring mount as the car brakes...follow? This characteristic has the benefit of creating a fulcrum, over which the truck is trying to "rise", and which induces downforce during braking. Lets talk about what happens during acceleration, for a moment....when you acclerate, the axle/leaf spring arangement has a tendency to want to "lift" the truck...and this is because the axle is inducing force down the centerline of the leaf spring, which forms a "lifting arm"....basically, motive force is transferred down the leaf spring to the approximate center of the vehicle, and this lifts the truck...which in turn transfers weight back over the axle, increasing tractive force at the tires.... Finally....since the point at which the axle rotates, up and down, is centered around the front leaf spring mount...pinion angle stays within limits. Noe then......what about that reverse 4 link? All bad, all the time. First off, when you arrange the links to the REAR of the truck...the axle will swing on those links, and EVERY time the axle goes up and down, those links pull the axle towards the REAR of the truck.... Next...what about pinion angle? Well, reverse 4 links NEVER solve for pinion angle, because they ALWAYS make the pinion angle climb WAY positive, because the upper links are ALWAYS shorter than the lower ones... What about imparting motive force? Well, again...because the links are behind the axle, when the axle rotates, the links tend to pull the rear of the vehicle down....and this is NOT optimum. Finally, what about braking? This is where it gets REALLY scary.....on a reverse 4 link, when you hit the brakes....the links, which are oriented towards the REAR of the truck, want to rotate UP and OVER the axle.....or, more significantly, the axle wants to rotate DOWN and BEHIND the rear of the truck....DEFINITELY an unsafe arrangement. So, why are revers 4 links "popular"? Well, fortunately, they are becoming MUCH less popular, but the answer to the question is...because they require NO knowledge of vehicle dynamics, and they eliminate that pesky requirement to actually ENGINEER a solution to that gas tank location. |
|||||